Comparison of genotyping and weight of evidence results when applying different genotyping strategies on samples from a DNA transfer experiment

Artikel

In this study, we assessed to what extent data on the subject of TPPR (transfer, persistence, prevalence, recovery) that are obtained through an older STR typing kit can be used in an activity-level evaluation for a case profiled with a more modern STR kit.

Newer kits generally hold more loci and may show higher sensitivity especially when reduced reaction volumes are used, and this could increase the evidential value at the source level. On the other hand, the increased genotyping information may invoke a higher number of contributors in the weight of evidence calculations, which could affect the evidential values as well. An activity scenario well explored in earlier studies [1,2] was redone using volunteers with known DNA profiles. DNA extracts were analyzed with three different approaches, namely using the optimal DNA input for (1) an older and (2) a newer STR typing system, and (3) using a standard, volume-based input combined with replicate PCR analysis with only the newer STR kit. The genotyping results were analyzed for various aspects such as percentage detected alleles and relative peak height contribution for background and the contributors known to be involved in the activity. Next, source-level LRs were calculated and the same trends were observed with regard to inclusionary and exclusionary LRs for persons who had or had not been in direct contact with the sampled areas. We subsequently assessed the impact on the outcome of the activity-level evaluation in an exemplary case by applying the assigned probabilities to a Bayesian network. We infer that data from different STR kits can be combined in the activity-level evaluations.

Reference Duijs, F. E., Meijers, E., Kokshoorn, B., & Sijen, T. (2023). Comparison of genotyping and weight of evidence results when applying different genotyping strategies on samples from a DNA transfer experiment. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 137(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02918-7
1 January 2023

Publication date

Jan 2023

Author(s)

Francisca E. Duijs
Erin Meijers
Titia Sijen

Publications:

Research database