Mandatory Volunteer Work as Fair Reciprocity for Unemployment and Social BenefitsArtikel
This small exploratory study aims to reveal the perceptions of female participants in mandatory volunteering programmes and to formulate directions for further research. We analyse how in Rotterdam the transition from labour market re-integration policies to a mandatory reciprocity approach is viewed by long-term unemployed women who were already volunteering.
Modern welfare policies are increasingly based on notions of reciprocity. Citizens on welfare benefits have to do something in return, e.g. volunteer work. Notwithstanding general public support, social philosophers have been critical on ‘mandatory’ activities in community programmes. So far, the participants themselves have scarcely been asked about the (un)fairness of ‘mandatory volunteering’.
Surprisingly, the participants in this study claim that the new approach better recognises their contribution to ‘society’. They also view the policy as necessary and fair to other benefit claimants who are perceived to lack any motivation to give something back to society. An agenda for further research is presented.
Reinout Kleinhans, Delft University of Technology
Maarten van Ham, Delft University of Technology and IZA
Veldboer, Lex, Kleinhans, Reinout en Maarten van Ham (2015). Mandatory Volunteer Work as Fair Reciprocity for Unemployment and Social Benefits. IZA Discussion Paper No.9111, June 2015.